If we’re striving to be inoffensive, shouldn’t we go all in?
So I was reading an article about this American country pop
band, which recently changed their name to remove one of the words in their
band name, which can be considered offensive and even racist. The name of this band included a term used to
refer to the American south, which started with a D, ended with an E, and is
five letters long, and includes the letters I, X, and another I (not
necessarily in that order). It’s no
longer a word that can be said (I think), so I can’t spell it out or say it. So now, this band has a new two word
name.
As I read the article, it occurred to me that one of the
other words in their band name can also be considered offensive. In order to not offend, I won’t say it, or
spell it out, but it is considered by many to be a derogatory term used to
refer to women, and is also a term used to refer to baby chickens. The word starts with a C, ends with an S, and
is six letters long, including the letters, H, I, C, and K (not necessarily in
that order).
My question is, if it is our society’s goal to eliminate
offensive language from our vocabulary, wouldn’t this word also need to be
removed from this band’s name? After
all, are not women owed the same respect as anyone else, and should not be
referred to using a word considered by some to be derogatory? This makes me wonder why this all female band
chose to keep this women-specific derogatory word, while removing the widely
considered racist word from their band name.
There is still one word left in their original band name which could be
used, either on its own, or with some other non-offensive words. And since they were already making a name
change, why not just take care of the issue with both words at the same time?
Comments
Post a Comment