Comfortable in the middle

This is the 5th post in the What my decade long foray into the creation-evolution debate taught me about the human condition (and how it applies today) series . I still remember the event - it was at a large church in Cary, NC, on a Saturday morning - a special event open to the general public, concerning creation and the origins of life on Earth.  I took the students in my creation/evolution course to the event.  We had just finished an overview of how people think - cognition, biases, and other aspects of social psychology, along with common logical fallacies people commit when arguing for their position.  I tasked the students to watch out for cognitive biases and logical fallacies, and to write about them in their course journal.  The event did not disappoint.  It was an eye-opening experience for the students.  It’s one thing to read about, and discuss the business model and evangelistic efforts of the professional young earth creationists - it’s much better to experience it.  No

This is the fourth post in the  What my decade long foray into the creation-evolution debate taught me about the human condition (and how it applies today)  series .   The topic of authority and expertise is certainly not exclusive to the creation/evolution debate.  When a serious issue arises, and good information is needed, most people look to experts who can speak authoritatively on the issue.  Consider the circumstances involving the COVID-19 pandemic.  The unknowns and uncertainties we faced pointed us to the professional opinions of infectious disease experts.  Who else would have sufficient knowledge to give us some sense on how to proceed?  Yet, consultation of experts doesn’t always lead to definitive answers and guidance, does it?  With COVID-19, it got pretty complex, as expert opinions varied, and got entangled with politics, power plays and conspiratorial thinking.  In the end, many people rejected the authority of experts (at least some of them) and headed down paths whic

At the start, let me say, don’t blame the messenger - I’m only sharing information about what authoritative spiritual leaders have agreed on, and declared.  I’m just a curious onlooker.    A number of prominent leaders in charismatic Christianity have laid down the law in an attempt to tame the wild, wild west of unregulated modern Christian prophetic practice.  If you’re not familiar with modern Christian prophecy, there’s an entire world of it readily available thanks to social media and streaming video platforms.  Dozens and dozens of self-proclaimed prophets have YouTube channels, some with large international followings, and others with limited local church community followings.  A huge array of recorded prophetic words are waiting to be discovered by anyone who can hit the correct combination of search terms.  Start watching, and the super-helpful Youtube video recommendation algorithm begins to suggest more and more similar content.  I fell into it just out of curiosity, based o

 It’s been nearly two and a half months since I’ve last posted on the topic of God’s False(?) Prophets , where I indicated I would have one last concluding post.  This might be it (unless…the former President Trump DOES become reinstated as president – maybe in August 2021 – some are saying, and that might make for an interesting follow-up post). This post will cover two items – a brief update, and my final thoughts as represented by the title, the dilemma of seeds and weeds.  First the update. What have God’s false(?) prophets been up to recently? The majority of God’s false(?) prophets are still as confident (on the surface) as ever that the former President Trump won the 2020 presidential election, and that there’s going to be some sort of big reveal of election fraud, culminating in Mr. Trump’s reinstatement as president.  The manner in which they talk about it is a bit different now – less overt, and more of couched language that loyal followers understand.  There’s still pl

This is the third post in the What my decade long foray into the creation-evolution debate taught me about the human condition (and how it applies today) series .  This post ended up somewhat longer than I hoped.  Explaining my thoughts on complexity is a bit complex! Science as a way of knowing I loved being able to teach introductory college biology – it was a staple course I taught for 19 years.  I taught it to a lot of students – usually three sections a year, each with 60-118 students.  Lots of enrolled students were not interested in science, and were only there to check-off one of their two required science electives.  Lots of college freshmen came in with a negative impression of science – many did not have good experiences with their high school science classes.  For this reason, I felt it important to convince them from the beginning that the course was worth their while, and presented them with value beyond a checkmark on a list, and nothing more than memorizing useless

This is the second post in this series.  Here is a link to the first post (an overview of the series). Integrating faith and learning I really had not given any thought to any potential issues between Christian belief and evolutionary theory until I began my career as a biology professor at a Christian university in North Carolina.  I took the position because I was specifically looking for a way to blend my Christian belief within a profession, and I felt that taking a faculty position at a Christian university was a great way to do this.  There wasn’t a single event which got me interested in the creation-evolution debate - it was a series of events and experiences.  First, I began teaching a basic biology course, which included typical introductory-level coverage of evolutionary theory.  The textbook was a commonly used one at many universities, and it  very briefly acknowledged there was some controversy concerning evolutionary theory.  I had many students with strong Christian fa